Etiopathogenesis behind Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: Review Article

Surbhi

doi:10.1055/s-0043-1764181

View/Download PDF

Buy Reprints

PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article

5 (

); 47-49

doi:

10.1055/s-0043-1764181

Etiopathogenesis behind Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: Review Article

Surbhi^1,

1Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India

Address for correspondence Surbhi, Patna Medical College and Hospital, 9 Anandpuri west boring Canal Road, Patna-800001, Bihar, India (e-mail: surbhinarayan60@gmail.com).

Published: 2023-05-26

Licence

This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Semicircular canal dehiscence remains one of the rare and least touched chronic vestibular diseases worldwide. Even though microbial, congenital, and genetically determined, as well as mixed characteristics are known to be involved in the pathogenesis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SSCDS), many facets of the pathogenesis of semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome still need to be simplified. Management plan related to pathogenesis has not yet been established. The primary objective of this review is to present and evaluate the etiopathogenesis behind SSCDS. This study is a systematic narrative review. A PubMed search (1970-2022) was performed for studies on epidemiology and pathogenesis of SSCDS. All included articles were categorized according to level of evidence. Five hundred and sixty papers were identified, of which 25 were found to be relevant for this review. SSCDS is a multifactorial disease. There is still no consensus as to what the specific etiology is behind the syndrome. No convincing evidence is available for most associated factors and pathogenesis. Important objectives in research of SSCDS should be achieving consensus about the definition of SSCDS and gaining more in-depth knowledge of the pathogenesis of SSCDS, especially the role of congenital and acquired causes. There is still a need for further well-designed studies on the various etiopathogenesis and management of SSCDS.

Keywords

superior semicircular canal

superior semicircular canal dehiscence

vertigo

middle cranial fossa

Show Related Articles from PubMed

Introduction

Any pathology causing fluid motion that can cause cupular deflection in the absence of head rotation and even that is read by the brain is head motion (vertigo) which is accompanied by eye movement (nystagmus). The association of vertigo induced by pressure change or loud sounds with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal (SSC) was first laid out in 1998.¹ In 1949, Cawthorne² pointed out that a “third window” mechanism is responsible for the positive Hennebert sign of labyrinthine fistula. Dehiscence of bone over the SSC and consequential connection with the middle cranial fossa allows a third mobile window into the inner ear in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SSCDS). In a normal person where the semicircular canal is covered with bone, sound coming from the stapes and oval window is dissipated across the cochlear partition. In the third labyrinthine window, there is an additional pathway for acoustic energy dissipation that goes to semicircular canal, which leads to fluid movement causing cupula deflection. Increased intracranial pressure can also trigger semicircular canal (Urban Schwarzenberg).³ Tragal compression, nose-blowing, or other also results in pressure gradient between the inner ear and middle fossa. In addition, SCDS may be characterized by autophony, conductive hearing loss, which is not due to middle ear pathology, and/or pulsatile tinnitus.⁴ High-resolution computed tomography scans with reconstructions in the plane of the superior canal and orthogonal to that plane are done to establish the diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

A PubMed search (1970-2022) was performed for studies on epidemiology and pathogenesis of SSCDS. All included articles were categorized according to the level of evidence. Articles were sorted based on keywords “superior,” “canal,” “dehiscence,” “vertigo” in all age group irrespective of gender Design: Systematic narrative review.

Etiopathogenesis

The true cause of canal dehiscence syndrome is still unknown. The dehiscence may, at least in part, be congenital and also may have occurred during the development of the inner ear. It can as well be caused from certain infections and head trauma. The prevalence of SCD is 0.5 to 0.6% as seen in histological studies in cadaver temporal bone.^5,6 The prevalence of SCD from reviewing high resolution CT scans accounts to 4 to 8%.^7,8 Dehiscence alone cannot cause the syndrome since it needs some sort of trigger to initiate it, and therefore many patients might have dehiscence which remains asymptomatic. SCD has been found to be¹ congenital,² acquired, or³ mixed where a genetic predisposition followed by a secondary event trigger SSCD. Predominantly, it has a middle-aged onset and there is a statistically significant increase in prevalence with increasing age,⁹ makes a pure congenital cause less likely. However, SSCDS has also been reported in children and affected siblings¹⁰ indicating genetic associations.

Congenital Anomalies

The SSC roof was indicated to show continuous thickening during the early years of life, with reports proposing that dehiscence ensues from a defect in postnatal develop- ment.¹¹ Due to protrusion of the membranous labyrinth into the middle cranial fossa in fetuses, adhesion with the overlying dura has been postulated to prevent entire bone coverage of the SSC in some individuals resulting into thinning of the roof of canal and thereby causing SSCD.¹² Ossification of the petrous bone over the labyrinth occurs from birth to the age of three.^4,5,13 If the bone is insufficient, the resulting morphological abnormality may prone certain individuals to SSCD.

Secondary Triggers

Shearing force arising from a head injury or trauma to the temporal bone causes slow progressive erosion of thin bone and increased dural elasticity with time. A sudden increase in intracranial pressure is also a suggested secondary trigger.¹⁴ A cadaveric study concluded that, when only an endosteal layer is present over the SSC, this is accountable to secondary events that could cause dehiscence.¹⁵ Nager explained single case of a defect of the superior canal in the middle cranial fossa. He attributed the bony defect to senile osteoporosis of the petrous bone.¹³ Changes seen in osteoporosis, thinning of trabeculae, and relative increase in the fatty marrow can be related to semicircular canal. A study also accounted for an association between aging and SSCD prevalence. Decreased semicircular canal roof height with age indicates that SSC dehiscence might be an acquired phenomenon, linked somehow to aging of the base of the skull.¹⁶ Changes in cranial sphenoid angle with age demonstrate skeletal aging of the skull base. Skull base wear has been seen as a general progressive process, denoting the frequency of bilateral involvement.¹⁷ SCD may also be hugely associated with a reduction in contralateral temporal bone thickness (< 0.5 mm). This theory of acquired etiology and skull base wear was carried out by other temporal bone pathologies such as spontaneous oto-liquorrhea due to osseous-dural fistula of the tegmen tympani.¹⁸

Combination of Causes

A continuous negative balance of labyrinthine osseous metabolism occurring with a congenital thin layer of bone over the SSC has been suggested as casual mechanism of SCD.¹⁹ Syphilis has shown its effect on the otic capsule, especially the semicircular canals. Lesions range from a proliferative periostitis and fibrosis of the canals to bony obliteration of the semicircular canals. Specimens with clinical history of syphilis when examined for gummas as well as the nongummatous manifestations of otosyphilis resulted in periostitis, fibrosis, and deformation of the semicircular canals.²⁰ Multiple small intensity cranial trauma from combat sports or diving, for instance, has been associated with SCD. A defect in the floor of the middle cranial fossa at the level of the canal might also occur secondary to increments in the pressure of the cerebrospinal fluid.²¹ Similarly, arachnoid granulations are known to cause tegmen erosion, encephaloceles, and ongoing cerebrospinal fluid leaks lead to dehiscence in wall of SSC.²² Nakajima et al showed that an opening can change the impedance of the otic capsule to an adequate degree to cause a functional third mobile win- dow.²³ Vestibular schwannoma-related erosion is noted in few subjects. Otosclerosis was found around the oval window on both sides. Ten percent of incidence of otosclerosis was seen in large samples of temporal bones.²⁴. Microcavitations are found in periosteal and endosteal layers of temporal bone specimens of SCD. Microcavitation within the temporal bone is most likely due to osteoclastic activity, which is seen in both young and old patients, patients with and without otosclerosis, and in cases with SSCD. Pathologic changes of chronic otitis media also result in thinning of semicircular canal followed by its dehiscence. Bone remodeling within the otic capsule has been reported to be inhibited especially at or near the cochlea, except under some pathological conditions such as otosclerosis, Paget's disease, or mastoiditis, when bone remodeling can occur.²⁵.

Final Comments

Due to the absence of a single theory, it is suggested that multiple genetic, congenital, and acquired causes are responsible for SCD. Elevated intracranial pressure over the years may be an etiologic factor in bilateral thinning of the skull base. Our study reveals symptoms and signs of SCD first develop in adulthood. We suggest, therefore, that a secondary event may occur, which fractures the thin bone or destabilizes dura over a pre-existing dehiscence. This second event may be a head injury or sudden change in intracranial pressure. The increased radiologic prevalence of SCD among older age groups suggests that this is more commonly an acquired rather than congenital condition. There is still a need for further well-designed studies on the various etiopathogenesis and management of SSCDS.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

Minor LB, Solomon D, Zinreich JS, Zee DS. Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(3):249-258.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cawthorne T. Some observations on the pathology and surgical treatment of labyrinthine vertigo of non-infective origin. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1949;4(6):342-359.
[Google Scholar]
Tullio P. Das Ohr und die Entstehung der Sprache und Schrift. [The ear and the origin of language and writing]. Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1929. at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Sulla%20 funzione%20delle%20varie%20parti%20dell%27orecchio%20 interno%20%28German%20translation%3A%20Das%20Ohr%20 und%20die%20Entstehung%20von%20Sprache%20und%20 Schrift%29&publication_year=1929&author=Tullio%2CP (accessed Last accessed on February 28, 2023)
[Google Scholar]
Minor LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(10):1717-1727.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Carey JP, Minor LB, Nager GT. Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(2):137-147.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stimmer H, Hamann KF, Zeiter S, Naumann A, Rummeny EJ. Semicircular canal dehiscence in HR multislice computed tomography: distribution, frequency, and clinical relevance. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(2):475-480.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cloutier JF, Belair M, Saliba I. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: positive predictive value of high-resolution CT scanning. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(12):1455-1460.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nadgir RN, Ozonoff A, Devaiah AK, Halderman AA, Sakai O. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: congenital or acquired condition? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(5):947-949.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sugihara EM, Babu SC, Kitsko DJ, Haupert MS, Thottam PJ. Incidence of pediatric superior semicircular canal dehiscence and inner ear anomalies: a large multicenter review. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(9):1370-1375.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mikulec AA, McKenna MJ, Ramsey MJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(2):121-129.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mikulec AA, McKenna MJ, Ramsey MJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(2):121-129.
[Google Scholar]
Ward BK, van de Berg R, van Rompaey V. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the Bârâny Society. J Vestib Res. 2021;31(3):131-141.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Takahashi N, Tsunoda A, Shirakura S, Kitamura K. Anatomical feature of the middle cranial fossa in fetal periods: possible etiology of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132(4):385-390.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nager FR. Pathology of the labyrinthine capsule, and its clinical significance. In: Fowler Jr EP, Kernan J Deds, eds. Medicine of the Ear. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons; 1947. p. :237-269. Google Scholar
[Google Scholar]
Minor LB. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Am J Otol. 2000;21(1):9-19.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Whyte Orozco J, Martinez C, Cisneros A, Obon J, Gracia-Tello B, Angel Crovetto M. [Defect of the bony roof in the superior semicircular canal and its clinical implications] Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011;62(3):199-204.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Klopp-Dutote N, Kolski C, Biet A, Strunski V, Page C. A radiologic and anatomic study of the superior semicircular canal. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133(2):91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2015.11.001 Epub 2015 Dec 3. PMID: 26671715
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Léonetti G, Signoli M, Hershkovitz I. Variation de l'angle sphénoïdal du crâne humain en fonction du vieillissement. C R Biol. 1997;320:943-947. Article Download PDF View Record in Scopus. Google Scholar
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gracia-Tello B, Cisneros A, Crovetto R. Effect of semicircular canal dehiscence on contralateral canal bone thickness. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2013;64(2):97-101. Article Download PDF View Record in Scopus. Google Scholar
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Brandolini C, Modugno GC, Pirodda A. Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal: a review of the literature on its possible pathogenic explanations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(3):435-437.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Goodhill V. Syphilis of the ear: a histopathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1939:48676-48706.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hegemann SC, Carey JP. Is superior canal dehiscence congenital or acquired? A case report and review of the literature. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011;44(2):377-382. ix
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gacek RR. Arachnoid granulation cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99(11):854-862.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pisano DV, Niesten MEF, Merchant SN, Nakajima HH. The effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on intracochlear sound pressures. Audiol Neurotol. 2012;17(5):338-348.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lindsay JR. Histopathology of otosclerosis. 1973. Archives of Otolaryngology. 97:24-29. at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lindsay+JR.+His-topathology+of+otosclerosis.+Arch+Otalaryngol+1973%3B97%3A24%E2%80%9329 (accessed Last accessed on February 28, 2023)
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kamakura T, Nadol JB Jr. Evidence of osteoclastic activity in the human temporal bone. Audiol Neurotol. 2017;22(4-5):218-225.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]